@inproceedings{Isenberg:2006:NPR,
optpostscript = {},
optorganization = {},
author = {Tobias Isenberg and Petra Neumann and Sheelagh Carpendale and Mario
Costa Sousa and Joaquim A. Jorge},
optkey = {},
optannote = {},
optseries = {},
editor = {Doug DeCarlo and Lee Markosian},
url = {http://cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~isenberg/paperpages/Isenberg_2006_NPR.html},
address = {New York},
localfile = {papers/Isenberg.2006.NPR.pdf},
optisbn = {},
publisher = {ACM Press},
optkeywords = {},
optmonth = {},
optciteseer = {},
doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124728.1124747},
optcrossref = {},
optwww = {},
booktitle = NPAR2006,
optvolume = {},
optnumber = {},
abstract = {Pen-and-ink line drawing techniques are frequently used to depict
form, tone, and texture in artistic, technical, and scientific
illustration. In non-photorealistic rendering (NPR), considerable
progress has been made towards reproducing traditional pen-and-ink
techniques for rendering 3D objects. However, formal evaluation
and validation of these NPR images remain an important open
research problem. In this paper we present an observational study
with three groups of users to examine their understanding and
assessment of hand-drawn pen-and-ink illustrations of objects in
comparison with NPR renditions of the same 3D objects. The results
show that people perceive differences between those two types of
illustration but that those that look computer-generated are still
highly valued as scientific illustrations.},
title = {{N}on-{P}hotorealistic {R}endering in {C}ontext: {A}n {O}bservational
{S}tudy},
year = {2006},
pages = {115--126},
}
|